- Joined
- Nov 21, 2019
- Messages
- 6,792
- Reaction score
- 124,307
- Points
- 11
- Age
- 55
- Location
- Орёл
- 💎VM
- 432,131.00
- New country
- 🌐Единия
- Enneatype
- 5 (?)
- Gender
- Male
- Ashram resident
- Yes
Still, the discussion is more about the end product. That is precisely what characterizes someone who works for themselves.Some are strongly pronounced individualists, able to work competently and responsibly (you could say they are masters of their trade or trades). Some are good performers. Some are excellent organizers, able to create an enterprise and a team that brings their ideas to life. Some can invest in ideas that appeal to them. The socioeconomic system will call for all of these things; the proportion and quantity of each may change as the system changes.
For a shoemaker, the end product is boots; for a baker, bread, and so on.
But an “organizer” has nothing to show for it at the end. I mean, they are dependent on others.
As it was in ancient times, so it is now: show that you are capable of creating something.
In the modern, deliberately confusing system of labor organization, no one is deliberately allowed to know what they actually do (create). They themselves do not know.
Yes, we have been convinced of the value of being a cog in an incredibly complex and “NECESSARY” mechanism called WORK. In essence, that is precisely what made people slaves.
It was done very deliberately and cunningly.
The point is not to become divided again. The point is for the value of every person as a creator to emerge once more—and for parasites to disappear.
Because now 95% of people work for God knows whom, doing God knows what, while 5% live lavishly. And life, on the whole, does not get any better.
Because that is not the goal of those 5%. Their goal is to continue living lavishly.