Pushkin Is Not Your Everything

Веретенников Сергей

ОМ Шанти

Сергей Васильевич

Админ.
З.Клуб
О.Клуб
К+
Joined
Nov 21, 2019
Messages
6,898
Reaction score
127,067
Points
11
Age
55
Location
Орёл
💎VM
442,385.50
New country
🌐Единия
Enneatype
5 (?)
Gender
Male
Ashram resident
Yes
From your very first years at school, you were taught that a bad guy named Dantes simply showed up and shot Pushkin.

Moreover, those very same teachers make you memorize Lermontov’s poem “The Death of the Poet.”

And it is, in fact, not really about that bad guy at all.

It literally says that Russia killed Pushkin!

“You, greedy crowd standing around the throne,​
Executioners of Freedom, Genius, and Glory!​
You hide beneath the shelter of the law,​
Before you, judgment and truth—everything is silent!..​
But there is also God’s judgment, confidants of depravity!​
There is a terrible judgment: it awaits;​
It cannot be reached by the ringing of gold,​
And it knows thoughts and deeds in advance.​
Then you will appeal in vain to slander:​
It will not help you again,​
And you will not wash away, with all your black blood,​
The poet’s righteous blood!”​


There you have it!

Everyone had been bought off!

Pushkin’s wound was not fatal.

But no one helped him.

From the very beginning—from the moment he was wounded.

His body was literally dragged along because no one helped.

It was as if everyone had conspired.

Even when doctors arrived two hours later—which was very late—all they did was put on a bandage!
And that was it!

And the real doctor who started doing something arrived only at about 8:00 p.m.—and he did not treat him, but merely pretended to, making the problem worse.

Look: the duel took place at about 4:30 p.m.
At about 8:00 p.m., a doctor arrived who supposedly undertook Pushkin’s treatment.
At the same time, there was also a family doctor, who had vanished without a trace and appeared only after 8:00 p.m.

And immediately after his death, they elevated him and arranged everything so that Pushkin supposedly revered the existing Russian government and Orthodoxy.

There had never been either of those things in his life!

But everything was rewritten as if there had been.

Despite the fact that he had been exiled, punished, and was quite a notorious brawler!

And suddenly he became “our everything”—someone who revered the Church and the Russian authorities...

Everything was stolen and remade.


The man had just died.

You would think—what was there left to fear?

But then some astonishing activity began around his memory.

The tsar instructed Zhukovsky to go through Pushkin’s papers and destroy anything that might damage his posthumous image.

Think about that.

The man died—and his biography was already being edited.

What to leave to posterity.

What not to leave.

Which Pushkin to show Russia.

And which one would be better forgotten.

And gradually, an entirely different Alexander Sergeyevich emerged.

No longer the man who had been exiled.

Not the man who wrote bold political poems.

Not the man who mocked the authorities.

Not the man who associated with the future Decembrists.

Not the hot-tempered, азартный, scandalous man constantly getting involved in duels.

But an almost exemplary Orthodox poet of the state.

A believer.

One who revered the tsar.

Reconciled before death with everything with which he had spent his whole life in very complicated relations.


The funeral, too, turned out to be astonishingly quiet.

The coffin was moved to another church at night.

He was buried practically in darkness and almost without witnesses.

A strange story for a man who would soon be declared one of Russia’s greatest symbols.

It creates quite a paradox.

The living Pushkin was inconvenient.

He was exiled.

He was watched.

His poems were censored.

He was hated...

He was mired in debts, scandals, cards, women, duels, and political antics.

But the dead Pushkin suddenly turned out to be extremely convenient.

Because the dead can no longer write anything.

They cannot object.

They cannot cause another scandal.

They cannot send someone to a duel.

And most importantly, they cannot say:

“Guys, actually, that’s not what I meant at all.”

At last, a monument can be made out of a living, contradictory person.

And the deeper you dig into the history of his final days, the less it resembles the schoolbook fairy tale:

“There was a great poet. The evil Dantes arrived. He fired. The poet died.”

No.

There are too many people involved.

Too many interests.

Too much inaction.

Too many strange things before his death.

And far too much editing afterward.
 

3110199

З.Клуб
О.Клуб
Рег.
Ра-1
Ра-2
Ра-3
Ра-4
Ра-5
ООН-1
К+
Joined
Apr 27, 2021
Messages
100
Reaction score
684
Points
18
Age
30
💎VM
514.50
Gender
Male
Ashram resident
Yes
Academy training
KEY
Regarding Orthodoxy and Pushkin’s opinion of it... “The Tale of the Priest and His Workman Balda.” I think everything is clear :)
 

1301

З.Клуб
О.Клуб
Рег.
ОТГ-1
Joined
Jun 4, 2026
Messages
23
Reaction score
68
Points
7
Age
66
💎VM
211.00
Gender
Female
Веретенников Сергей Веретенников Сергей , quoted message

I like the theory that Pushkin later became Dumas.
 

Веретенников Сергей

ОМ Шанти

Сергей Васильевич

Админ.
З.Клуб
О.Клуб
К+
Joined
Nov 21, 2019
Messages
6,898
Reaction score
127,067
Points
11
Age
55
Location
Орёл
💎VM
442,385.50
New country
🌐Единия
Enneatype
5 (?)
Gender
Male
Ashram resident
Yes
There is a theory that Pushkin reincarnated as Michael Jackson.

Below, I tried to substantiate it.

And there are very serious FACTS supporting this theory.

  • Pushkin had African roots—Michael Jackson had African roots.
  • Pushkin stood out in appearance among the Russian nobility—Jackson stood out in appearance among those around him. Especially at a time when Black people were not allowed into places where white people were permitted...
  • Pushkin lived predominantly among white Europeans—because of vitiligo, Jackson’s skin gradually became practically white. In other words, Pushkin entered the elite of the white race. And Jackson did the same. You have probably seen the new 2026 feature film about Jackson? He was literally refused everywhere. But he managed to enter the world of WHITE people. Be sure to watch this film!
  • Pushkin wrote poetry—Michael Jackson wrote poetry. Very good, meaningful poetry, too.
  • Pushkin became one of the best-known poets of his era—Jackson became one of the best-known singers of his era.
  • Pushkin influenced the language of literature—Jackson influenced the language of music, dance, and song.
  • Pushkin was a global cultural figure—Jackson was a global cultural figure.
  • Pushkin constantly addressed the theme of freedom—Jackson publicly spoke out against wars and so on.
  • Pushkin clashed with the system of his time—Jackson clashed with the system of his time.
  • Pushkin was surrounded by rumors and scandals about his personal life—Jackson was surrounded by rumors and scandals about his personal life.
  • Pushkin’s personal life became the subject of public persecution—Jackson’s personal life became the subject of worldwide public persecution.
  • Pushkin was mortally wounded by Dantes with a pistol shot—Jackson died from propofol administered to him by his doctor, Conrad Murray.
  • Pushkin’s death resulted from the actions of another person—Jackson’s death also resulted from the actions of another person. Supposedly, everything was deliberately staged. In other words, it was a contract killing.
  • Pushkin died young—Jackson did too.
  • Pushkin left behind enormous debts—Jackson also left enormous debts.
  • After Pushkin’s death, his work acquired enormous cultural value—Jackson’s legacy also acquired enormous cultural value after his death.
  • Pushkin was a celebrity during his lifetime—Jackson was too. But both became especially famous after death.
  • Pushkin was simultaneously an object of admiration and attack—Jackson was simultaneously an object of worship and fierce criticism.
  • Pushkin was connected with both African and European worlds—in Jackson’s biography, the theme of Black and white identity also became central.
  • Hollywood producers considered Michael Jackson for the role of Pushkin. Pay attention to this! Hollywood producers—that is an outside perspective suggesting that Jackson, and only Jackson, could play Pushkin!
  • Jackson came to Russia twice—and it was here that he wrote several poems!
  • Jackson visited the Moscow museum named after Pushkin.
  • Pushkin died in 1837—Jackson was born in 1958: 121 years lie between these events, that is, 11 × 11.
  • Both were international GENIUSES.
  • Continuing the theme that Russia killed Pushkin: America killed Michael Jackson.
Appearance: both had African roots, dark curly hair, slender figures, expressive faces, and appearances unusual for their surroundings.

In terms of the course of their lives: creative genius → enormous fame → conflict with the system → society’s interference in their personal lives → persecution → financial problems → tragic death resulting from another person’s actions → even greater fame after death.

From an esoteric perspective: Pushkin seemed to express himself primarily through words, while Jackson did so through the same poetic impulse via words, music, voice, movement, and stage image (it is quite possible to assume that Pushkin would have done the same under modern conditions).

I tried to find photographs of Jackson and a portrait of Pushkin from approximately the same age and with their heads positioned approximately the same way.

Here is what I got:

Без-имкуцкуени-1.jpg


Naturally, the portrait of Pushkin on the right and the photo of Jackson are authentic.
You can find them on the Internet yourself.
 

8008

З.Клуб
О.Клуб
Рег.
ОТГ-1
Ра-1
Joined
May 26, 2025
Messages
35
Reaction score
190
Points
7
Age
41
Location
Единия
💎VM
2,986.50
New country
🌐Единия
Gender
Male
Ashram resident
Yes
Academy training
M-SNOV
Pushkin’s native language was French.

He was even nicknamed the Frenchman, in case anyone didn’t know.

His first creative impulses in his youth were in French.

Immediately before the letter, in Chapter III, Pushkin writes:

> I foresee further difficulties:
> To save my native land’s honor,
> I will undoubtedly have to
> Translate Tatyana’s letter.
> **She knew Russian poorly,**
> She did not read our journals
> **And expressed herself with difficulty
> In her native tongue,
> And so she wrote in French…**
> What can one do! I say again:
> To this day, ladies’ love
> Has not expressed itself in Russian;
> To this day, our proud language
> Is unused to epistolary prose.

A little further on, he speaks of the women in his circle:

> Did they not all,
> With only a weak and difficult command of Russian,
> Distort it so charmingly,
> And on their lips, did not a foreign tongue
> Become their native one?

And immediately before **“I am writing to you…”** there is another very important stanza:


But here is
> **An incomplete, feeble translation,**
> A pale copy of a living picture...

And only after that:

> **I am writing to you—what more is there to say?
> What else can I tell you?..**

Thus Pushkin’s literary device is completely unambiguous: **within the world of the novel, Tatyana wrote the famous letter not in Russian but in French. Pushkin presents the Russian text “I am writing to you…” to the reader as his own “incomplete, feeble translation” of the French letter.**

And this is not merely Tatyana’s whim. Pushkin specifically broadens the observation to include the noblewomen of his time: they might have had a poor command of Russian, while **French was effectively becoming the language of social communication, correspondence, and declarations of love**. That is precisely why the episode with the letter is such excellent evidence of the linguistic situation at the beginning of the nineteenth century.
 
Shoutbox
  1. 1965 @ 1965:
    Намасте! Где ьы я не написала,везде выдается ошибка,и у меня ничего невозможно отправить написанное.Подскажите пожалуйста,это только у меня или у всех такое?
  2. 4257 @ 4257:
    А я думала ,что у меня только ,тоже выдает ошибка...Так бывает...
  3. 230261 @ 230261:
    Намасте, и у меня второй день так же. Ошибка пишет.
  4. 230261 @ 230261:
    И в Школе и в Ашраме тоже самое .
  5. 1965 @ 1965:
    Иу меня второй день ,сегодня вообще ничкго написать не могу
  6. Веретенников Сергей @ Веретенников Сергей:
    Проблема решается. Это связано с общей проблемой во всём интернете.
  7. 1965 @ 1965:
    Благодарю !!!!Работает .
  8. 1111 @ 1111:
    Намасте. Тоже самое происходит. Второй день невозможно отправить сообщения . Ждем разрешения проблемы.
  9. 52640 @ 52640:
    С компьютера где давно залогинен сообщения оптравляются, а с телефона нет
Top Bottom